Many things have been said so far,  in the last few days, ever since  Indian prime minister, Manmohan  Singh, remarked during an  interaction with five print media  editors in Delhi, on June 29 , that ‘ 25  per cent of the population of  the population of Bangladesh  swear by the Jamaat-e-Islami and  are very anti-India, and are in the  clutches, many times, of the ISI’ –  Pakistan Army’s intelligence wing.  The comment has drawn reactions  from a range of people, including  members of the present  government, leaders of the main  opposition in parliament BNP,  former Indian diplomats, the  Indian High Commission’s official  clarification and the Bangladesh  government’s refusal to issue a  statement.  Given Manmohan’s reputation as  an intellectual and scholar, there is no reason, however, to treat his  comments as merely an innocent  remark.  The first thing to note is the timing of the comment made by the  Indian premier. The Indian  external affairs minister, SM  Krishna is likely to visit Dhaka on  July 6.  The Indian Water Resources  Minister Salman Khurshid is likely  to visit Dhaka soon after to give  final touches to a treaty on sharing the waters of River Teesta. Sonia  Gandhi is expected arrive on July  25 , while Manmohan himself is  likely to visit Dhaka by September.  Given the context, it is difficult to  believe that the apparently ‘off- the-record’ comments had been  mistakenly inserted in the  transcripts of the meeting, as  asserted by Indian High  Commission in Dhaka. Instead, it  would not be a stretch to presume  that the comments arrived at the  right time to exert an influence on  the number of agreements that are likely to be signed during these  visits. An ominous note in Manmohan’s  comment, ‘that Bangladesh’s  political landscape can change  anytime’, can hardly be interpreted as anything but a means to put  pressure and create a sense of  vulnerability on the government in  power, in Bangladesh, prior to  negotiations in which the Indian  government are expected to seek a number of concessions from the  Bangladesh government.  Furthermore, given the Bangladesh government’s visibly shaky  relations in recent months with the US government, following the Dr  Yunus saga, Manmohan’s  comments could serve as a double- edged sword to impress upon the  US the apparent threat of  fundamentalist forces in  Bangladesh.  Manmohan’s comments, in the  end, provide the answers for the  questions he raises. If a significant  part of the population the country  is indeed anti-Indian, it is because  of such comments and expression  of intent of top officials of the  Indian government, time and  again, which not only cast  aspersions on the ordinary millions of the country, disrespect their  mandates and insult Bangladesh’s  sovereignty, but also reflect a  tendency to wrestle out undue  concessions in negotiations,  through any means. The Indian  policymakers must realise that if  they truly want to build friendly  relations between the  neighbouring countries, as indeed  it should be, than it should take  effective steps to resolve the  numerous unresolved issues –  primarily a result of Delhi’s selfish  unwillingness - between the two  countries and make negotiations  beneficial to both sides.  Meanwhile, for the present Awami  League-Jatiya Party led  government, elected to parliament with a three-fourths majority, it  now becomes their patriotic duty,  to not buckle under such pressure  and wrestle out from India the best interest of the country in the days  to come.   
